| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
...with respect to rejecting invalid entries such as upwards
symlinks. Also ensure that valid trees are only checked once by
remebering known valid tress though marker files in local storage.
|
|
...whenever it is given access to a Git repository.
The referenced storage config needs to outlive the repository
config instance.
|
|
...through marker files kept in storage under generation regime.
These can be used to allow valid source trees, i.e., those free of
upwards symlinks, to be cached in a persistent manner over multiple
builds.
|
|
This is useful when the caller already knows that the tree to look
up is valid, and thus the extra check step can be safely skipped.
|
|
This removes a scenario where otherwise successful (exit code 0)
calls to just and just-mr would result in an error-level log
message.
|
|
|
|
Match behaviour of reading trees, which always checks for invalid
entries, also for reading blobs.
|
|
This allows individual blobs read to be checked, e.g., for upwards
symlinks, also when not part of a tree, which performs such a
validation for its entries during its parsing into a GitTree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
... and do mark artifacts internally as synchronized. First all all,
we will abort anyway, to the entry won't even be read and, secondly
it is not necessarily true that the artifact is synchronized.
|
|
When backing up target-cache entries we use parallelism at two
dimensions, the independent cache entries and for each entry we
retrieve the artifacts in parallel. If for each dimension we use
the full amount of parallelism allowed, that gives a number of
threads up to the square of the amount of parallelism specified by
the user. Therefore, use in each dimension only the square root
of the allowed parallelism keeping the total parallelism (up to
rounding) within the specified range.
|
|
... which might be quite ahead of the end time of the invocation if
writing out of the action graph delays the end of the invocation.
|
|
...in all return paths, including in reporting caught exceptions.
In this way give the opportunity for any calling AsyncMap to
receive an expected fatal logger call on failure and thus be able
to shut down gracefully. This is in line with the AsyncMap design,
where the loggers are assumed to be safe to call by a consumer.
|
|
When using a serve end point, the analysis phase might take quite
long if serve has to actually build a delegated target or, at
least, has to synchronize artifacts with the remote end point.
Therefore, also record the time the build phase started (if building
is requested) as an additional time stamp in the profile.
|
|
|
|
This fixes a bug in which the setup root was falsely being changed
by unconditionally searching early for a default configuration
files, despite one being explicitly provided at the command line.
|
|
... so that at this level, the full activity of the serve service can
be monitored.
|
|
|
|
|
|
... which requires all entries to be sorted in
lexicographical order.
|
|
... by ignoring it rather than trying to dereference a nullptr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Include in the profile also the effective remote-execution endpoint,
properties, and dispatch list. Software projects are often tested
in a variety of environments or hardware configurations; as,
obviously, the performance might differ significantly (especially
depending on the used hardware) a proper analysis therefore requires
the possibility to distinguish the various backends. Adding the
effective configuration adds this posibility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For a generic rule, it is an error if map union of various
inputs (overlayed in correct order) does not form a proper stage. To
implement this check properly, we first have to construct the map of
all inputs and only then perform the staging check and not do the check
with only the runfiles, as 5e104a526cf76fe75312d2fd288a3c88f506fb0a
accidentally did. Fix this.
|
|
|
|
instead of ArtifactDigest
|
|
functions of the class
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During execution, paths are relative to the working directory of the
action; however, in our representation, all paths are always relative
to the action root. Commit d65d711f844224dcf9215c52be8f69fd2885adfc
tried to change the reporing to our usual standard, however got
the direction wrong; fix this.
|
|
...when calling std::filesystem::weakly_canonical, since the latter converts the argument path to an absolute path internally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In all presentations of actions to the user, we use output paths
relative to the root of the action directory. Therefore, we should
do the same in the profile. However, when noting the completion of
an action, we get paths as in the wire protocol, i.e., relative to
the working directory of the action. Therefore, rebase appropriately.
|
|
|
|
and while there, replace `auto` with explicit signatures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use a pointer to the actual Profile object to handle profiling,
if requested. For this to work, actual object needs to stay in
scope. However, we handle most of the operations, including parsing
of arguments, in a global try-catch block. In order to be able to
also correctly write a profile file outside this block, move the
scope of the Profile object to top-level in main.
While there, also improve the signature of the Profile class. That
class is only meaningful, if a profile should eventually be writting
to disk. So reflect this in the constructur. Also, once we know the
file name to write the profile to (if any), we have already parsed
the command line; so the making available of the command line to the
profile can be enforced by adding this to the constructor as well.
Co-authored-by: Denisov Maksim <denisov.maksim@huawei.com>
|
|
As parsing the the command-line is non-trivial, we include all the
relevant information about the command line in the profile. This
should also include the subcommand. For sake of completeness, we
also include the non-option arguments of the subcommand.
|
|
Extend the profile by including non-zero exit codes of individual
actions. When looking at an individual build invocation, the actions
with non-zero exit code are often the interesting ones, like root
cause of a build failure, or failing tests. Therefore, it is useful
information to include this information; by leaving out the exit
code if it is zero, we do not significantly increase the profile.
|
|
|
