Cross compiling and testing cross-compiled targets ================================================== So far, we were always building for the platform on which we were building. There are, however, good reasons to build on a different one. For example, the other platform could be faster (common theme when developing for embedded devices), cheaper, or simply available in larger quantities. The standard solution for these kind of situations is cross compiling: the binary is completely built on one platform, while being intended to run on a different one. Cross compiling using the CC rules ---------------------------------- The `C` and `C++` rules that come with the `justbuild` repository already have cross-compiling already built into the toolchain definitions for the `"gnu"` and `"clang"` compiler families; as different compilers expect different ways to be told about the target architecture, cross compiling is not supported for the `"unknown"` compiler family. First, ensure that the required tools and libraries (which also have to be available for the target architecture) for cross compiling are installed. Depending on the distribution used, this can be spread over several packages, often shared by the architecture to cross compile to. Once the required packages are installed, usage is quite forward. Let's start a new project in a clean working directory. ``` sh $ touch ROOT ``` We create a file `repos.template.json` specifying the one local repository. ``` {.jsonc srcname="repos.template.json"} { "repositories": { "": { "repository": {"type": "file", "path": "."} , "bindings": {"rules": "rules-cc"} } } } ``` The actual `rules-cc` are imported via `just-import-git`. ``` sh $ just-import-git -C repos.template.json -b master --as rules-cc https://github.com/just-buildsystem/rules-cc > repos.json ``` Let's have `main.cpp` be the canonical _Hello World_ program. ``` {.cpp srcname="main.cpp"} #include int main() { std::cout << "Hello world!\n"; return 0; } ``` Then, a `TARGETS` file describing a simple binary. ``` {.jsonc srcname="TARGETS"} { "helloworld": { "type": ["@", "rules", "CC", "binary"] , "name": ["helloworld"] , "srcs": ["main.cpp"] } } ``` As mentioned in the introduction, we need to specify `TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG`, `OS`, and `ARCH`. So the canonical building for host looks something like the following. ``` sh $ just-mr build -D '{"TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG": {"FAMILY": "gnu"}, "OS": "linux", "ARCH": "x86_64"}' INFO: Performing repositories setup INFO: Found 22 repositories involved INFO: Setup finished, exec ["just","build","-C","...","-D","{\"TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG\": {\"FAMILY\": \"gnu\"}, \"OS\": \"linux\", \"ARCH\": \"x86_64\"}"] INFO: Requested target is [["@","","","helloworld"],{"ARCH":"x86_64","OS":"linux","TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG":{"FAMILY":"gnu"}}] INFO: Analysed target [["@","","","helloworld"],{"ARCH":"x86_64","OS":"linux","TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG":{"FAMILY":"gnu"}}] INFO: Discovered 2 actions, 0 tree overlays, 1 trees, 0 blobs INFO: Building [["@","","","helloworld"],{"ARCH":"x86_64","OS":"linux","TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG":{"FAMILY":"gnu"}}]. INFO: Processed 2 actions, 0 cache hits. INFO: Artifacts built, logical paths are: helloworld [0d5754a83c7c787b1c4dd717c8588ecef203fb72:16992:x] $ ``` To cross compile, we simply add `TARGET_ARCH`. ``` sh $ just-mr build -D '{"TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG": {"FAMILY": "gnu"}, "OS": "linux", "ARCH": "x86_64", "TARGET_ARCH": "arm64"}' INFO: Performing repositories setup INFO: Found 22 repositories involved INFO: Setup finished, exec ["just","build","-C","...","-D","{\"TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG\": {\"FAMILY\": \"gnu\"}, \"OS\": \"linux\", \"ARCH\": \"x86_64\", \"TARGET_ARCH\": \"arm64\"}"] INFO: Requested target is [["@","","","helloworld"],{"ARCH":"x86_64","OS":"linux","TARGET_ARCH":"arm64","TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG":{"FAMILY":"gnu"}}] INFO: Analysed target [["@","","","helloworld"],{"ARCH":"x86_64","OS":"linux","TARGET_ARCH":"arm64","TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG":{"FAMILY":"gnu"}}] INFO: Discovered 2 actions, 0 tree overlays, 1 trees, 0 blobs INFO: Building [["@","","","helloworld"],{"ARCH":"x86_64","OS":"linux","TARGET_ARCH":"arm64","TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG":{"FAMILY":"gnu"}}]. INFO: Processed 2 actions, 0 cache hits. INFO: Artifacts built, logical paths are: helloworld [b45459ea3dd36c7531756a4de9aaefd6af30e417:9856:x] $ ``` To inspect the different command lines for native and cross compilation, we can use `just analyse`. ``` sh $ just-mr analyse -D '{"TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG": {"FAMILY": "gnu"}, "OS": "linux", "ARCH": "x86_64"}' --dump-actions - $ just-mr analyse -D '{"TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG": {"FAMILY": "gnu"}, "OS": "linux", "ARCH": "x86_64", "TARGET_ARCH": "arm64"}' --dump-actions - $ just-mr analyse -D '{"TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG": {"FAMILY": "clang"}, "OS": "linux", "ARCH": "x86_64"}' --dump-actions - $ just-mr analyse -D '{"TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG": {"FAMILY": "clang"}, "OS": "linux", "ARCH": "x86_64", "TARGET_ARCH": "arm64"}' --dump-actions - ``` Testing in the presence of cross compiling ------------------------------------------ To understand testing the in the presence of cross compiling, let's walk through a simple example. We create a basic test in subdirectory `test` ``` sh $ mkdir -p ./test ``` by adding a file `test/TARGETS` containing ``` {.jsonc srcname="test/TARGETS"} { "basic": { "type": ["@", "rules", "shell/test", "script"] , "name": ["basic"] , "test": ["basic.sh"] , "deps": [["", "helloworld"]] } , "basic.sh": { "type": "file_gen" , "name": "basic.sh" , "data": "./helloworld | grep -i world" } } ``` Now, if we try to run the test by simply specifying the target architecture, we find that the binary to be tested is still only built for host. ``` sh $ just-mr analyse --dump-targets - -D '{"TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG": {"FAMILY": "gnu"}, "OS": "linux", "ARCH": "x86_64", "TARGET_ARCH": "arm64"}' test basic INFO: Performing repositories setup INFO: Found 22 repositories involved INFO: Setup finished, exec ["just","analyse","-C","...","--dump-targets","-","-D","{\"TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG\": {\"FAMILY\": \"gnu\"}, \"OS\": \"linux\", \"ARCH\": \"x86_64\", \"TARGET_ARCH\": \"arm64\"}","test","basic"] INFO: Requested target is [["@","","test","basic"],{"ARCH":"x86_64","OS":"linux","TARGET_ARCH":"arm64","TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG":{"FAMILY":"gnu"}}] INFO: Analysed target [["@","","test","basic"],{"ARCH":"x86_64","OS":"linux","TARGET_ARCH":"arm64","TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG":{"FAMILY":"gnu"}}] INFO: Result of target [["@","","test","basic"],{"ARCH":"x86_64","OS":"linux","TARGET_ARCH":"arm64","TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG":{"FAMILY":"gnu"}}]: { "artifacts": { "pwd": {"data":{"id":"eede84ac9ccc613b4542d93b321fc2ef9dc7f260d49708e6512518254a6c0237","path":"pwd"},"type":"ACTION"}, "result": {"data":{"id":"eede84ac9ccc613b4542d93b321fc2ef9dc7f260d49708e6512518254a6c0237","path":"result"},"type":"ACTION"}, "stderr": {"data":{"id":"eede84ac9ccc613b4542d93b321fc2ef9dc7f260d49708e6512518254a6c0237","path":"stderr"},"type":"ACTION"}, "stdout": {"data":{"id":"eede84ac9ccc613b4542d93b321fc2ef9dc7f260d49708e6512518254a6c0237","path":"stdout"},"type":"ACTION"}, "time-start": {"data":{"id":"eede84ac9ccc613b4542d93b321fc2ef9dc7f260d49708e6512518254a6c0237","path":"time-start"},"type":"ACTION"}, "time-stop": {"data":{"id":"eede84ac9ccc613b4542d93b321fc2ef9dc7f260d49708e6512518254a6c0237","path":"time-stop"},"type":"ACTION"} }, "provides": { "lint": [ ] }, "runfiles": { "basic": {"data":{"id":"e5efe00530b6d0586a4d4257b01e5f9655958df30f5ec6db86d709f195078f29"},"type":"TREE"} } } INFO: List of analysed targets: { "@": { "": { "": { "helloworld": [{"ADD_CFLAGS":null,"ADD_CXXFLAGS":null,"ADD_LDFLAGS":null,"ARCH":"x86_64","BUILD_POSITION_INDEPENDENT":null,"CC":null,"CFLAGS":null,"CXX":null,"CXXFLAGS":null,"DEBUG":null,"DWP":null,"ENV":null,"HOST_ARCH":null,"LDFLAGS":null,"LINT":null,"OS":"linux","TARGET_ARCH":"x86_64","TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG":{"FAMILY":"gnu"}}] }, "test": { "basic": [{"ADD_CFLAGS":null,"ADD_CXXFLAGS":null,"ADD_LDFLAGS":null,"ARCH":"x86_64","ARCH_DISPATCH":null,"BUILD_POSITION_INDEPENDENT":null,"CC":null,"CFLAGS":null,"CXX":null,"CXXFLAGS":null,"DEBUG":null,"DWP":null,"ENV":null,"HOST_ARCH":null,"LDFLAGS":null,"LINT":null,"OS":"linux","RUNS_PER_TEST":null,"TARGET_ARCH":"arm64","TEST_ENV":null,"TEST_SUMMARY_EXECUTION_PROPERTIES":null,"TIMEOUT_SCALE":null,"TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG":{"FAMILY":"gnu"}}], "basic.sh": [{}] } }, "rules-cc": { "CC": { "defaults": [{"ARCH":"x86_64","DEBUG":null,"HOST_ARCH":null,"OS":"linux","TARGET_ARCH":"x86_64","TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG":{"FAMILY":"gnu"}}] }, "shell": { "defaults": [{"ARCH":"x86_64","HOST_ARCH":null,"TARGET_ARCH":"arm64"}] } }, "rules-cc/just/rules": { "CC": { "defaults": [{"ARCH":"x86_64","DEBUG":null,"HOST_ARCH":null,"OS":"linux","TARGET_ARCH":"x86_64","TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG":{"FAMILY":"gnu"}}] } }, "rules-cc/just/toolchain": { "CC": { "defaults": [{"ARCH":"x86_64","DEBUG":null,"HOST_ARCH":null,"OS":"linux","TARGET_ARCH":"x86_64","TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG":{"FAMILY":"gnu"}}], "gcc": [{"ARCH":"x86_64","DEBUG":null,"HOST_ARCH":null,"OS":"linux","TARGET_ARCH":"x86_64"}] } } } } INFO: Target tainted ["test"]. $ ``` The reason is that a test actually has to run the created binary and that requires a build environment of the target architecture. So, if not being told how to obtain such an environment, they carry out the test in the best manner they can, i.e., by transitioning everything to host. So, in order to properly test the cross-compiled binary, we need to do two things. - We need to setup remote execution on the correct architecture, either by buying the appropriate hardware, or by running an emulator. - We need to tell *justbuild* on how to reach that endpoint. To continue the example, let's say we set up an `arm64` machine, e.g., a Raspberry Pi, in the local network. On that machine, we can simply run a single-node execution service using `just execute`; note that the `just` binary used there has to be an `arm64` binary, e.g., obtained by cross compiling. The next step is to tell *justbuild* how to reach that machine; as we only want to use it for certain actions we can't simply set it as (default) remote-execution endpoint (specified by the `-r` option). Instead we create a file `dispatch.json`. ``` {.jsonc srcname="dispatch.json"} [[{"runner": "arm64-worker"}, "10.204.62.67:9999"]] ``` This file contains a list of lists pairs (lists of length 2) with the first entry a map of remote-execution properties and the second entry a remote-execution endpoint. For each action, if the remote-execution properties of that action match the first component of a pair the second component of the first matching pair is taken as remote-execution endpoint instead of the default endpoint specified on the command line. Here "matching" means that all values in the domain of the map have the same value in the remote-execution properties of the action (in particular, `{}` matches everything); so more specific dispatches have to be specified earlier in the list. In our case, we have a single endpoint in our private network that we should use whenever the property `"runner"` has value `"arm64-worker"`. The IP/port specification might differ in your setup. The path to this file is passed by the `--endpoint-configuration` option. Next, we have to tell the test rule, that we actually do have a runner for the `arm64` architecture. The rule expects this in the `ARCH_DISPATCH` configuration variable that you might have seen in the list of analysed targets earlier. It is expected to be a map from architectures to remote-execution properties ensuring the action will be run on that architecture. If the rules finds a non-empty entry for the specified target architecture, it assumes a runner is available and will run the test action with those properties; for the compilation steps, still cross compiling is used. In our case, we set `ARCH_DISPATCH` to `{"arm64": {"runner": "arm64-worker"}}`. Finally, we have to provide the credentials needed for mutual authentication with the remote-execution endpoint by setting `--tls-*` options appropriately. `just` assumes that the same credentials can be used all remote-execution endpoints involved. In our example we're building locally (where the build process starts the actions itself) which does not require any credentials; nevertheless, it still accepts any credentials provided. ``` sh $ just-mr build -D '{"TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG": {"FAMILY": "gnu"}, "OS": "linux", "ARCH": "x86_64", "TARGET_ARCH": "arm64", "ARCH_DISPATCH": {"arm64": {"runner": "arm64-worker"}}}' --endpoint-configuration dispatch.json --tls-ca-cert ca.crt --tls-client-cert client.crt --tls-client-key client.key test basic INFO: Performing repositories setup INFO: Found 22 repositories involved INFO: Setup finished, exec ["just","build","-C","...","-D","{\"TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG\": {\"FAMILY\": \"gnu\"}, \"OS\": \"linux\", \"ARCH\": \"x86_64\", \"TARGET_ARCH\": \"arm64\", \"ARCH_DISPATCH\": {\"arm64\": {\"runner\": \"arm64-worker\"}}}","--endpoint-configuration","dispatch.json","--tls-ca-cert","ca.crt","--tls-client-cert","client.crt","--tls-client-key","client.key","test","basic"] INFO: Requested target is [["@","","test","basic"],{"ARCH":"x86_64","ARCH_DISPATCH":{"arm64":{"runner":"arm64-worker"}},"OS":"linux","TARGET_ARCH":"arm64","TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG":{"FAMILY":"gnu"}}] INFO: Analysed target [["@","","test","basic"],{"ARCH":"x86_64","ARCH_DISPATCH":{"arm64":{"runner":"arm64-worker"}},"OS":"linux","TARGET_ARCH":"arm64","TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG":{"FAMILY":"gnu"}}] INFO: Target tainted ["test"]. INFO: Discovered 3 actions, 0 tree overlays, 3 trees, 3 blobs INFO: Building [["@","","test","basic"],{"ARCH":"x86_64","ARCH_DISPATCH":{"arm64":{"runner":"arm64-worker"}},"OS":"linux","TARGET_ARCH":"arm64","TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG":{"FAMILY":"gnu"}}]. INFO: Processed 3 actions, 3 cache hits. INFO: Artifacts built, logical paths are: pwd [da762809b16a6b476c6d45f67695769bfd6fdb01:160:f] result [7ef22e9a431ad0272713b71fdc8794016c8ef12f:5:f] stderr [e69de29bb2d1d6434b8b29ae775ad8c2e48c5391:0:f] stdout [cd0875583aabe89ee197ea133980a9085d08e497:13:f] time-start [32fdb8269cd3a5a699eeeafd1be565308167c110:11:f] time-stop [32fdb8269cd3a5a699eeeafd1be565308167c110:11:f] (1 runfiles omitted.) INFO: Target tainted ["test"]. $ ``` The resulting command line might look complicated, but the authentication-related options, as well as the dispatch-related options (including setting `ARGUMENTS_DISPATCH` via `-D`) can simply be set in the `"just args"` entry of the `.just-mrrc` file. When inspecting the result, we can use `just install-cas` as usual, without any special arguments. Whenever dispatching an action to a non-default endpoint, `just` will take care of syncing back the artifacts to the default CAS. Testing a matrix of configurations ---------------------------------- This example also shows that a single test can be run in a variety of configurations. - Different compilers can be used. - We can build and test for the host architecture, or cross-compile for a different architecture and run the tests there. Often, all possible combinations need to be tested, especially for projects that are meant to be portable. Doing this by hand or manually maintaining all combinations as a list of CI tasks is cumbersome and error prone. Therefore, there is a rule `["@", "rules", "test", "matrix"]` that can take care of handling all configuration combinations in a single build. The fields are the same as of a test suite. ``` {.jsonc srcname="test/TARGETS"} ... , "matrix": { "type": ["@", "rules", "test", "matrix"] , "deps": ["basic"] } ... ``` If run without special configuration, it also behaves like a test suite. ``` shell $ just-mr build test matrix INFO: Performing repositories setup INFO: Found 22 repositories involved INFO: Setup finished, exec ["just","build","-C","...","test","matrix"] INFO: Requested target is [["@","","test","matrix"],{}] INFO: Analysed target [["@","","test","matrix"],{}] INFO: Target tainted ["test"]. INFO: Discovered 3 actions, 0 tree overlays, 3 trees, 3 blobs INFO: Building [["@","","test","matrix"],{}]. INFO: Processed 3 actions, 0 cache hits. INFO: Artifacts built, logical paths are: basic [4a75cd3ff7b5b6552c03d74580c1d336f3f38a4e:208:t] INFO: Target tainted ["test"]. ``` But we can instruct it via the configuration variable `TEST_MATRIX` to run its `"deps"` in a product of configurations, with `TEST_MATRIX` cleared there. ``` shell $ just-mr describe test matrix INFO: Performing repositories setup INFO: Found 22 repositories involved INFO: Setup finished, exec ["just","describe","-C","...","test","matrix"] [["@","","test","matrix"],{}] is defined by user-defined rule ["@","rules-cc","test","matrix"]. | Given a group of tests, build them in a variety of configurations. | | The configuration variable TEST_MATRIX is expected to be a map with | each value being a map itself. Sequentially for each key, all possible | values of the associated map are tried and staged to the appropriate | key. Thus, the tests in "deps" are built in an exponential number of | configurations. | | If TEST_MATRIX is unset, {} will be assumed, i.e., all the "deps" will | be built precisely once, in the current configuration. In this way, | the "matrix" rule can be used instead of the "suite" rule to allow | user-defined configuration matrices, dispatching over parameters for | dependencies (e.g., the toolchain). String fields - "stage" | The logical location this test suite is to be placed. | Individual entries will be joined with "/". Target fields - "deps" | The targets that suite is composed of. Variables taken from the configuration - "TEST_MATRIX" | Map describing the dimensions of the matrix to run the tests for. | | Keys are config variables. The value for each key has to be a map | mapping the stage name to the corresponding value for that config | variable. Result - Artifacts | The disjoint union of the runfiles of the "deps" targets, | evaluated and staged as requested by TEST_MATRIX and finally | staged to the location given by "stage". - Runfiles | Same as artifacts. ``` Typically, one sets the matrix of desired configurations in a `"configure"` target next to the matrix target which then acts as the main entry point. ``` {.jsonc srcname="test/TARGETS"} ... , "ALL": { "type": "configure" , "tainted": ["test"] , "target": "matrix" , "config": { "type": "'" , "$1": { "TEST_MATRIX": { "TARGET_ARCH": {"x86": "x86_64", "arm": "arm64"} , "TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG": {"gcc": {"FAMILY": "gnu"}, "clang": {"FAMILY": "clang"}} } } } } ... ``` Each key in `"TEST_MATRIX"` is a configuration variable where different values should be taken into account. For each such variable we specify in another map the values that should be tried, keyed by the path there the tests should be staged; obviously, if we run the same test in many configurations we need to stage the various test results to different locations. Now, in a single invocation, we can run our test in all four relevant configurations. Still, credentials and dispatch information needs to be provided. ``` shell $ just-mr build -D '{"OS": "linux", "ARCH": "x86_64", "ARCH_DISPATCH": {"arm64": {"runner": "arm64-worker"}}}' --endpoint-configuration dispatch.json --tls-ca-cert ca.crt --tls-client-cert client.crt --tls-client-key client.key test ALL INFO: Performing repositories setup INFO: Found 22 repositories involved INFO: Setup finished, exec ["just","build","-C","...","-D","{\"OS\": \"linux\", \"ARCH\": \"x86_64\", \"ARCH_DISPATCH\": {\"arm64\": {\"runner\": \"arm64-worker\"}}}","--endpoint-configuration","dispatch.json","--tls-ca-cert","ca.crt","--tls-client-cert","client.crt","--tls-client-key","client.key","test","ALL"] INFO: Requested target is [["@","","test","ALL"],{"ARCH":"x86_64","ARCH_DISPATCH":{"arm64":{"runner":"arm64-worker"}},"OS":"linux"}] INFO: Analysed target [["@","","test","ALL"],{"ARCH":"x86_64","ARCH_DISPATCH":{"arm64":{"runner":"arm64-worker"}},"OS":"linux"}] INFO: Target tainted ["test"]. INFO: Discovered 12 actions, 0 tree overlays, 9 trees, 3 blobs INFO: Building [["@","","test","ALL"],{"ARCH":"x86_64","ARCH_DISPATCH":{"arm64":{"runner":"arm64-worker"}},"OS":"linux"}]. INFO: Processed 12 actions, 6 cache hits. INFO: Artifacts built, logical paths are: clang/arm/basic [6503faa5935250fe50ebc2f00dbdd9dbf592fd3a:208:t] clang/x86/basic [90ead7c3b83f6902c3b0b032d63d734e0ea55a0b:208:t] gcc/arm/basic [24c3f2de7e920ad294edba63da596d810a2c350a:208:t] gcc/x86/basic [4a75cd3ff7b5b6552c03d74580c1d336f3f38a4e:208:t] INFO: Target tainted ["test"]. ```