Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
While reporting an origin target with action number within that
target describes an action uniquely in a way meaningful to the
user, it might not always be eay to unserstand which precise action
is currently running. For example, for a library with many source
files, we have a target generating a large number of actions and
the association of source file to action number requires detailled
knowledge of the build description. The name of the primary ouput
of that action, on the other hand immediately identifies the file
that is compiled. Therefore, report this as well.
|
|
|
|
! => not; && => and, || => or
|
|
|
|
...with regular instances that have controlled life-times.
This avoids race conditions in tracking and reporting the results
of analysis and build, as the serve endpoint can orchestrate
multiple builds at the same time asynchronously. As a bonus
side-effect this also ensures the correctness of the progress
reporting per orchestrated build.
|
|
... with two minor code base changes compared to previous
use of gsl-lite:
- dag.hpp: ActionNode::Ptr and ArtifactNode::Ptr are not
wrapped in gsl::not_null<> anymore, due to lack of support
for wrapping std::unique_ptr<>. More specifically, the
move constructor is missing, rendering it impossible to
use std::vector<>::emplace_back().
- utils/cpp/gsl.hpp: New header file added to implement the
macros ExpectsAudit() and EnsureAudit(), asserts running
only in debug builds, which were available in gsl-lite but
are missing in MS GSL.
|
|
|